Math 371 - Philip Pare
Tuesday, February 22, 2011
6.1, due on 2/23
1. The definition of coset was unclear to me but the examples helped somewhat but not completely.
2. Theorem 6.4 seemed very logical and the proof very straightforward. The same thing with theorem 6.5.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Newer Post
Older Post
Home
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment