Math 371 - Philip Pare
Tuesday, February 22, 2011
6.1, due on 2/23
1. The definition of coset was unclear to me but the examples helped somewhat but not completely.
2. Theorem 6.4 seemed very logical and the proof very straightforward. The same thing with theorem 6.5.
No comments:
Post a Comment
‹
›
Home
View web version
No comments:
Post a Comment